SSDC Makes Market Towns "Fight Over Scraps"
Walking round our High Street recently, delivering leaflets for the 2012 Christmas Extravaganza, I was very encouraged. Wincanton is not a big enough town to attract the national names that we find in Yeovil or other large towns, but that means that over many years our High Street has evolved into a very unique place, with a character of its own, and we need to play to those strengths.
However, along the way we do experience ups and downs. We saw our Town Team apply twice to get a slice of the Mary Portas funding. Sadly that wasn't to be. But that's ok as the dreams behind the Town Team are achievable even without Mary Portas funding.
Next we have a follow up grant of £100,000 being given to SSDC (and other Councils) as a further support to High Street regeneration. This is very encouraging indeed. So what has, or is happening, to this money?
I finished my trek around Wincanton High Street at Divine Wines, where you can buy quality wine and spirits, but also a mean cup of coffee and chocolate. And to accompany that Jenny serves an amazing cinnamon swirl.
Whilst enjoying this well-deserved treat I was approached by a friend who informed me that SSDC had indeed received £100,000 funding to help regenerate Market Town High Streets. Further enquiries revealed that because Yeovil is by far the largest Market Town in our area, a decision was taken to allocate Yeovil 30% of this fund with all other Market Towns left to apply for a share of the pool. My belief is that this fund is open to all Market Towns, even if they didn't apply for The Mary Portas Scheme Funding.
I can't argue that Yeovil is the biggest Market Town in our area. However this seems to be a clear example of one rule for one and a different ball game for the rest. Why isn't Yeovil applying like all the other Market Towns? Why is Yeovil given all the treats and all the others left to fight over scraps like dogs and cats under the table?
Observing what is happening around us I see a growing feeling of dissatisfaction at the way in which SSDC administers finances. Time after time we see Yeovil picking up the cream and the rest of the towns and villages fighting for the crumbs. If that isn't bad enough it seems crazy to me that SSDC officials still try to deny or put spin on their actions, claiming that because Yeovil is our main area town, everyone understands that they should always have the lion's share. It seems that SSDC may be the only people who actually believe that. Maybe they don't really believe that other towns and villages exist beyond the Yeovil boundary. We get told that all our towns and villages get subsidised by Yeovil.
I wonder? Does anyone else believe that? I am beginning to think that it's the other way round. I believe that Yeovil tends to ride high on the backs of all the surrounding towns and villages.
I made some enquiries about this fund and to find out why Yeovil doesn't need to apply like the rest of us. I was told that a committee which has representation from all market towns made this decision. Making further enquiries from one of our own District Councillors I was told that this was utter balderdash. It seems that committee may actually involve a very select few. Maybe Mr Pallister and Mr Carroll would care to give an open and transparent explanation?
Isn't it time that our elected body actually tried to earn the respect of us mere mortals in the towns and villages? I have this rather naïve belief that people who are elected to ssuch bodies (from lowly Town and District Councils through to Parliament) are elected to "SERVE" and not ride roughshod over their constituents without any accountability. It seems that accountability stops with public finance.
Has anyone else out there experienced that sinking feeling when funding that was promised to finance an important local project is suddenly diverted to another worthy project...in Yeovil? I would be interested to hear what all you town and village councils have to say on this one.
Comments
Posts: 4
Reply #1 on : Mon October 15, 2012, 15:03:26
Posts: 1
Reply #2 on : Mon October 15, 2012, 22:17:23
Posts: 4
Reply #3 on : Mon October 15, 2012, 23:01:35
Posts: 1
Reply #4 on : Tue October 16, 2012, 09:05:15
Posts: 4
Reply #5 on : Tue October 16, 2012, 17:09:39
Posts: 4
Reply #6 on : Tue October 23, 2012, 10:30:32
Login to comment!